As I read this scenario, I was able
to observe different problems that the teacher failed to address and made her
use of technology harder than what it really is. When using technology, it is
very important that one as a teacher is very specific as to what the
expectations are of the assignments because students in the classroom now in
days are very knowledgeable as to what the features each technology devise
carries and what can be done with it. I believe that the main issue that Jane
did was that she might’ve introduced the wikis to the students and had them
create a group project. Taken that this is a 6th grade classroom, I believe
that Jane should set a rubric as to what cyber group work looks like in the
technology world in order to have the students understand the expectations that
they need to meet. I personally believe this is a crucial year that students
need to know about cyber bullying and cyber safety because they are in the
beginning of their middle school years and they need to understand the
importance of keeping their manners outside and inside the technology devices. Another
mistake that I saw that Jane made was that she did not give the students a
rubric as to what each member of the group was responsible for. If she would’ve
clarified that specifically before having the students go into the wikis, then the
roles of each student would not overlap and the conflict between the team
members would be reduced. Assigning each member of the team a specific
assignment and role within the research in a wiki will help a lot because even
though the students are going to be able to change the text the other students
post, they each will have a part and won’t have to mess with their parts of the
project. The third problem I noticed in this scenario is that the teacher did
not teach them or gave them a rubric as to what netiquette was and what she
expected of the interactions within the web. Adding a part of plagiarism and
where they receive the information for their projects is very important because
it is against school and federal policy to copy other people’s work and call it
“your own.” As I had suggested previously to Jane, allowing students to take
responsibility for a specific part of the project and that way reducing the
lacking of participation of some students in the groups as well as having some
students start erasing their peers input because it will become their grade as
well. In the link http://www.techforteachers.net/wikis-in-the-classroom.html,
they give examples of roles that can be assigned to each student in each team.
There is another website as to where the teacher is able to see the different
projects that can be created through wikis and how to assign them step by step.
It is crucial that the teacher is able to identify all the steps that need to
be covered before allowing students to use technology. The website https://www.wikispaces.com/content/classroom
also shows you the features of wikis and explains what the students can do and
cannot do. By knowing what students are capable of doing with technology, then
teachers can plan ahead and find a way to reduce the misbehaviors before it
even starts.
Resources
http://www.techforteachers.net/wikis-in-the-classroom.html
https://elearningindustry.com/how-to-use-wiki-in-the-classroom
https://www.wikispaces.com/content/classroom
Hello Lorena,
ReplyDeleteJust like you, I think that Jane needs to create a rubric for this research project. Students need to know what are guidelines and expectations when working in groups. I agree with you about assigning students specific parts of the assignment, setting group roles, can reduce plagiarism and lack or participation.